The story I started working on yesterday, and will continue working on today, is actually a piece I wrote a few months back but was unhappy with at the time. Of course, I was so beaten down creatively by my employment at insert name of professional sports league here that I failed to finish it in any satisfactory way. That will hopefully change during the next twenty-four to thirty-six hours. In this way, the story is sort of recycled, hence the going green reference. Get it. Recycled. Environmentalism. Going green. Stay with me, folks. We like to move quickly around here.
To give you a little bit of background on the story, its title is “The Often Unheralded Affect of Burnt Bagels and Weak Coffee.” As usual for one my creations, it is not plot heavy and, instead, focuses on the inner psychological workings of the main character, Nathan Yearlman, an eighty-four-year-old man living alone, more or less waiting to die. He has peculiar habits, and the story drops in on him in bed one early morning.
An interesting tidbit to note is that during the holidays this year, a member or two of my family, echoing something I’ve heard more than a few times prior, commented that it appears the inspiration behind a lot of the themes and characters in my stories are more than a little transparent, thinly veiled references to people I know and things they’ve done. This is an astute observation, and it’s mostly true. When you’re trying to churn things out of your imagination, you inevitably turn to people, places, and events you’ve experienced. Other people fascinate me, and I’m interested in exploring the things that make them tick. And like any other artist, I draw on things I know to create sketches of characters that are as real to me as anyone else in my world, full of flaws and ugly ideas, many of them difficult to like. That is the reality I want to create and share.
But my goal has never been to comment on or judge anyone. Once I outline the sketch, I let go of the person who inspired it and try my best to give the character a life of his or her own. There’s not much more to it than that. I don’t suppose to know for sure why anyone does what they do, so I don’t bother trying to figure it out. I believe that all people are a thousand times more complicated than they let on, so it’s more interesting and effective to make up my own neuroses than it is to analyze someone else’s.
I think there is a common thread among all these characters, and that, more than anything else, is what seems to have presented itself as the unifying theme of my work lately. All of the people in my stories do the majority of their dialogging internally, with their own minds. Their internal conversations are often layered and a little dark, some would even say negative. Yet, the way they often articulate themselves outwardly is simple and stoic, a lot of times completely contradictory to the way they think and feel. If you were to go back and look at “It Helps to Watch” or “The Sounds I Hear,” that element is pretty clear. For some reason, that is where my mind has chosen to set up shop.
I can psychoanalyze myself and hypothesize that this trait is a reflection of something in me, that it somehow allows me to deal with an ability to effectively express myself to others, that it lets me share something about myself, an attempt to be understood and validated by people I don’t feel I relate to, but I’m not a therapist. I just write stories that make me feel a certain way, and I try to do that in as unique a way as possible, something akin to auteurism in film. It’s like a mirror I look into every week, and I never know what the reflection is going to look like until someone else sees it.